NEW ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR TEST TEST | TEST ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR GUIDE

New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Test Test | Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Guide

New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Test Test | Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Guide

Blog Article

Tags: New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Test Test, Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Guide, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Pass Leader Dumps, New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Notes, Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Torrent

P.S. Free & New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PassCollection: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fH3qGVB2in2_jNLxMsrwJOcJvsDLwmqc

It is known to us that the error correction is very important for these people who are preparing for the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam in the review stage. If you want to correct your mistakes when you are preparing for the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam, the study materials from our company will be the best choice for you. Because our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor reference materials can help you correct your mistakes and keep after you to avoid the mistakes time and time again. We believe that if you buy the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam prep from our company, you will pass your exam in a relaxed state.

Perhaps you still feel confused about our PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam test questions when you browse our webpage. There must be many details about our products you would like to know. Do not hesitate and send us an email. Gradually, the report will be better as you spend more time on our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions. As you can see, our system is so powerful and intelligent. What most important it that all knowledge has been simplified by our experts to meet all people’s demands. All of our assistance is free of charge. We are happy that our small assistance can change you a lot. You don’t need to feel burdened. Remember to contact us!

>> New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Test Test <<

Free PDF Quiz PECB - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor –Reliable New Test Test

PassCollection is an authoritative study platform to provide our customers with different kinds of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam material to learn, and help them pass the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam as well as get their expected scores. There are three different versions of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study preparation: PDF, Software and APP online. To avoid their loss for choosing the wrong ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor learning questions, we offer related three kinds of free demos for our customers to download before purchase. Just come and try!

The PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification program is designed for professionals who have a deep understanding of information security management systems and audit principles. The PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam covers various topics, including information security management system standards, audit techniques, risk management, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam also tests the candidate's ability to plan, conduct, report, and follow up on an audit of an ISMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 27001 standards.

The PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification exam is intended for professionals who have significant experience in information security management and auditing. Candidates must have a minimum of five years of professional experience, with at least two years of experience in information security management and one year of experience in auditing. They must also have completed a PECB-recognized lead auditor training course or have equivalent knowledge and skills.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q79-Q84):

NEW QUESTION # 79
You ask the IT Manager why the organisation still uses the mobile app while personal data encryption and pseudonymization tests failed. Also, whether the Service Manager is authorized to approve the test.
The IT Manager explains the test results should be approved by him according to the software security management procedure. The reason why the encryption and pseudonymization functions failed is that these functions heavily slowed down the system and service performance. An extra 150% of resources are needed to cover this. The Service Manager agreed that access control is good enough and acceptable. That's why the Service Manager signed the approval.
You sample one of the medical staff's mobile and found that ABC's healthcare mobile app, version 1.01 is installed. You found that version 1.01 has no test record.
The IT Manager explains that because of frequent ransomware attacks, the outsourced mobile app development company gave a free minor update on the tested software, performed an emergency release of the updated software, and gave a verbal guarantee that there will be no impact on any security functions. Based on his 20 years of information security experience, there is no need to re-test.
You are preparing the audit findings Select two options that are correct.

  • A. There is NO nonconformity (NC). The IT Manager demonstrates he is fully competent. (Relevant to clause 7.2)
  • B. There is NO nonconformity (NC). The IT Manager demonstrates good leadership. (Relevant to clause
    5.1, control 5.4)
  • C. There is an opportunity for improvement (OI). The IT Manager should make the decision to continue the service based on appropriate testing. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.30)
  • D. There is an opportunity for improvement (OI). The organisation selects an external service provider based on the extent of free services it will provide. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.5.21)
  • E. There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation does not control planned changes and review the consequences of unintended changes. (Relevant to clause 8.1)
  • F. There is a nonconformity (NC). The IT Manager does not comply with the software security management procedure. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.30)

Answer: E,F

Explanation:
According to ISO 27001:2022 Annex A Control 8.30, the organisation shall ensure that externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system are controlled. This includes developing and entering into licensing agreements that cover code ownership and intellectual property rights, and implementing appropriate contractual requirements related to secure design and coding in accordance with Annex A 8.25 and 8.2912 In this case, the organisation and the developer have performed security tests that failed, which indicates that the secure design and coding requirements of Annex A 8.29 were not met. The IT Manager explains that the encryption and pseudonymization functions failed because they slowed down the system and service performance, and that an extra 150% of resources are needed to cover this. However, this does not justify the acceptance of the test results by the Service Manager, who is not authorised to approve the test according to the software security management procedure. The Service Manager should have consulted with the IT Manager, who is the owner of the process, and followed the procedure for handling nonconformities and corrective actions. The Service Manager's decision to continue the service based on access control alone exposes the organisation to the risk of compromising the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of personal data processed by the mobile app. Therefore, there is a nonconformity (NC) with clause 8.1, control A.8.30.
According to ISO 27001:2022 Clause 8.1, the organisation shall plan, implement and control the processes needed to meet information security requirements, and to implement the actions determined in Clause 6.1. The organisation shall also control planned changes and review the consequences of unintended changes, taking action to mitigate any adverse effects, as necessary12 In this case, the organisation has not controlled the planned change of the mobile app from version 1.0 to version 1.01, which was a minor update provided by the outsourced developer in response to frequent ransomware attacks. The IT Manager explains that the developer performed an emergency release of the updated software, and gave a verbal guarantee that there will be no impact on any security functions.
However, this is not sufficient to ensure that the change is properly assessed, tested, documented, and approved before deployment. The IT Manager should have followed the change management process and procedure, and verified that the updated software meets the security requirements and does not introduce any new vulnerabilities or risks. The IT Manager's reliance on his 20 years of information security experience and the developer's verbal guarantee is not a valid basis for skipping the re-testing of the software. Therefore, there is a nonconformity (NC) with clause 8.1.
References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2


NEW QUESTION # 80
Which is the glue that ties the triad together

  • A. Process
  • B. People
  • C. Collaboration
  • D. Technology

Answer: D

Explanation:
The triad refers to the three elements of information security: confidentiality, integrity and availability3. Technology is the glue that ties the triad together, as it provides the means to implement various controls and measures to protect information from unauthorized access, modification or loss3. References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course - BSI


NEW QUESTION # 81
Scenario 7: Lawsy is a leading law firm with offices in New Jersey and New York City. It has over 50 attorneys offering sophisticated legal services to clients in business and commercial law, intellectual property, banking, and financial services. They believe they have a comfortable position in the market thanks to their commitment to implement information security best practices and remain up to date with technological developments.
Lawsy has implemented, evaluated, and conducted internal audits for an ISMS rigorously for two years now.
Now, they have applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification to ISMA, a well-known and trusted certification body.
During stage 1 audit, the audit team reviewed all the ISMS documents created during the implementation.
They also reviewed and evaluated the records from management reviews and internal audits.
Lawsy submitted records of evidence that corrective actions on nonconformities were performed when necessary, so the audit team interviewed the internal auditor. The interview validated the adequacy and frequency of the internal audits by providing detailed insight into the internal audit plan and procedures.
The audit team continued with the verification of strategic documents, including the information security policy and risk evaluation criteria. During the information security policy review, the team noticed inconsistencies between the documented information describing governance framework (i.e., the information security policy) and the procedures.
Although the employees were allowed to take the laptops outside the workplace, Lawsy did not have procedures in place regarding the use of laptops in such cases. The policy only provided general information about the use of laptops. The company relied on employees' common knowledge to protect the confidentiality and integrity of information stored in the laptops. This issue was documented in the stage 1 audit report.
Upon completing stage 1 audit, the audit team leader prepared the audit plan, which addressed the audit objectives, scope, criteria, and procedures.
During stage 2 audit, the audit team interviewed the information security manager, who drafted the information security policy. He justified the Issue identified in stage 1 by stating that Lawsy conducts mandatory information security training and awareness sessions every three months.
Following the interview, the audit team examined 15 employee training records (out of 50) and concluded that Lawsy meets requirements of ISO/IEC 27001 related to training and awareness. To support this conclusion, they photocopied the examined employee training records.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Lawsy lacks a procedure regarding the use of laptops outside the workplace and it relies on employees' common knowledge to protect the confidentiality of information stored in the laptops. This presents:

  • A. An anomaly
  • B. A conformity
  • C. A nonconformity

Answer: C

Explanation:
Lawsy's lack of specific procedures for the use of laptops outside the workplace, despite allowing such use, represents a nonconformity. ISO/IEC 27001 requires that security controls and management processes be clearly defined, documented, and implemented. Relying solely on employees' common knowledge does not fulfill the standard's requirements for managing information security risks associated with mobile and teleworking.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Clause A.6.2 (Mobile device and teleworking management)


NEW QUESTION # 82
You are the audit team leader conducting a third-party audit of an online insurance company. During Stage 1, you found that the organization took a very cautious risk approach and included all the information security controls in ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Appendix A in their Statement of Applicability.
During the Stage 2 audit, your audit team found that there was no evidence of a risk treatment plan for the implementation of the three controls (5.3 Segregation of duties, 6.1 Screening, 7.12 Cabling security). You raise a nonconformity against clause 6.1.3.e of ISO 27001:2022.
At the closing meeting, the Technical Director issues an extract from an amended Statement of Applicability (as shown) and asks for the nonconformity to be withdrawn.

Select three options of the correct responses of an audit team leader to the request of the Technical Director.

  • A. Review the documentation produced and withdraw the nonconformity.
  • B. Advise the Technical Director that once a nonconformity is raised it cannot be withdrawn.
  • C. Ask the auditor who raised the issue for their opinion on how you should respond to the request.
  • D. Advise management that the information provided will be reviewed when the auditors have more time.
  • E. Advise the Technical Director that the nonconformity must stand since the evidence obtained for it was clear.
  • F. Advise the Technical Director that his request will be included in the audit report.
  • G. Inform the Technical Director that the nonconformity will be changed to an Opportunity for Improvement.
  • H. State that a follow up audit will be necessary to review the evidence for the updated Statement of Applicability.

Answer: E,F,H

Explanation:
The three options of the correct responses of an audit team leader to the request of the Technical Director are:
* B. Advise the Technical Director that his request will be included in the audit report.
* D. Advise the Technical Director that the nonconformity must stand since the evidence obtained for it was clear.
* H. State that a follow up audit will be necessary to review the evidence for the updated Statement of Applicability.
* B. This response is correct because the audit team leader should document the request of the Technical Director and include it in the audit report, along with the audit findings and conclusions12. This will ensure transparency and traceability of the audit process and the audit results.
* D. This response is correct because the audit team leader should not withdraw the nonconformity based on the amended Statement of Applicability alone. The nonconformity was raised against clause 6.1.3.e of ISO 27001:2022, which requires the organisation to produce and maintain a risk treatment plan that defines how the information security risks are treated, including the controls selected and their implementation status34. The Statement of Applicability is only one part of the risk treatment plan, and it does not provide sufficient evidence that the controls have been implemented effectively. The audit team leader should base the nonconformity on the objective evidence obtained during the audit, not on the subjective claims of the auditee12.
* H. This response is correct because the audit team leader should state that a follow up audit will be necessary to review the evidence for the updated Statement of Applicability. A follow up audit is an audit that is conducted after a previous audit to verify the implementation and effectiveness of the corrective actions and/or opportunities for improvement that were agreed upon as a result of the previous audit56. The follow up audit should seek to ensure that the nonconformity has been effectively addressed and that the ISMS is compliant and effective. The follow up audit should also consider any new or changed risks or requirements that may affect the ISMS56.
References:
1: PECB Candidate Handbook - ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 25 2: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.7 3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 6.1.3.e 4: ISO/IEC
27005:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security risk management, clause
8.3.2 5: PECB Candidate Handbook - ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 25 6: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.7


NEW QUESTION # 83
As the ISMS audit team leader, you are conducting a second-party audit of an international logistics company on behalf of an online retailer. During the audit, one of your team members reports a nonconformity relating to control 5.18 (Access rights) of Appendix A of ISO/IEC 27001:2022. She found evidence that removing the server access protocols of 20 people who left in the last 3 months took up to 1 week whereas the policy required removing access within 24 hours of their departure.
Complete the sentence with the best word(s), dick on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the option to the appropriate blank section.

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation
The purpose of including access rights in an information management system to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is to provide, review, modify and remove these permissions in accordance with the organisation's policy and rules for access control.
Access rights are the permissions granted to users or groups of users to access, use, modify, or delete information assets. Access rights should be aligned with the organisation's access control policy, which defines the objectives, principles, roles, and responsibilities for managing access to information systems.
Access rights should also follow the organisation's rules for access control, which specify the criteria, procedures, and controls for granting, reviewing, modifying, and revoking access rights. The purpose of including access rights in an information management system is to ensure that only authorised users can access information assets according to their business needs and roles, and to prevent unauthorised or inappropriate access that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information assets. References:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A Control 5.181
ISO/IEC 27002:2022 Control 5.182
CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Training Course3


NEW QUESTION # 84
......

These are all the advantages of the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) certification exam. To avail of all these advantages you just need to enroll in the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) exam dumps and pass it with good scores. To pass the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) exam you can get help from PassCollection ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions easily.

Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Guide: https://www.passcollection.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor_real-exams.html

P.S. Free & New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PassCollection: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fH3qGVB2in2_jNLxMsrwJOcJvsDLwmqc

Report this page